Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tim Almond's avatar

"What matters isn’t a folk revival but that we have more people making music, singing songs and dancing so when the TV stops and you can’t get Spotify on your phone, some of the company can get out an instrument and accompany the rest as they sing and dance."

We have so many levels of redundancy in everything that this is unlikely to be a problem. Those who want to sing can still join choirs and groups, of course, but a family no longer has to get their child piano lessons to sing around it.

But it's also the case that more children than ever are learning a musical instrument. All this modern tech has made guitars and keyboards cheap. The internet makes teaching cheaper.

And I'm with Louis. I think there are some beautiful folk songs from the past, but I hear folk songs about people having to cross the water from Plymouth, and that's not really a modern problem. Much of our modern folk is in pop. People will join in with Angels by Robbie Williams, or some of Coldplays songs. I think the Beatles are very much our more modern folk music sometimes. I think Dry Your Eyes by The Streets is quite folky.

Ultimately, things will go where people want them to. Government subsidy can't make up for what people want.

Expand full comment
Alan Munro's avatar

Made me misty eyed for communal singing on the bus as we went on the Sunday school picnic.

Ten green bottles etc. And being Scottish, and British I’m sure there were some English songs in there too. One of the first songs I learned on the guitar was ‘The Streets of London’ by Ralph McTell and one of the first live bands I saw was The Strawbs. Of course, in the 70’s we didn’t have the SNP polluting our culture. Great post and the earlier one on council funding.

Expand full comment

No posts